Michael’s 18-attorney litigation boutique generated $6.8M in annual revenue—yet partners couldn’t agree whether the firm was actually profitable. Partner draws varied without a formula. Two associates spent most of their time on matters billed at $180/hour that actually cost $220/hour fully loaded. The bookkeeper “kept the trust account” but didn’t run three-way reconciliations—a state bar audit waiting to happen. Michael needed financial leadership built for legal economics, not generic accounting. He needed a CFO for law firms.

Why this matters

According to the Clio Legal Trends Report, the average firm collects only 86% of billable time—leaking the remaining 14% to write-downs, write-offs, and uncollected fees. Many firms perform even lower without visibility into which attorneys, matters, or clients drive the leakage. Specialized CFO services shift firms from reactive, compliance-only operations to strategic, profitable businesses.

What Is a CFO for Law Firms?

A law-firm CFO provides strategic finance tailored to legal realities: IOLTA compliance, matter-level profitability, realization optimization, partner compensation, and the integrations that tie Clio/MyCase to accounting for real-time visibility.

They work at the intersection of compliance and strategy—keeping trust accounts audit-proof while revealing which practice areas and clients generate profit (or drain it) and aligning partner pay with firm goals.

Core Financial Responsibilities (Legal-Specific)

Trust accounting oversight

  • IOLTA compliance and controls (no commingling)
  • Monthly three-way reconciliation (bank balance ⇄ client trust ledger total ⇄ GL)
  • Matter-level trust ledgers and documentation that survives bar audits

Matter-based financial tracking

  • True matter profitability (attorney cost rates, paralegal/staff time, hard costs, overhead allocation)
  • Early detection of unprofitable work before it consumes resources

Realization rate analysis

  • Measure worked → billed → collected gaps by attorney, client, and practice area
  • Fix leakage with better billing narratives, cadence, pricing, and collections

Partner compensation design

  • Draws vs. distributions; capital accounting; balanced formulas (origination, hours, realization) with discretionary leadership factors

Cash flow & FP&A

  • Forecast working capital given long collection cycles, plan partner tax distributions, and manage seasonal swings

Strategic KPIs & dashboards

  • Revenue per lawyer, leverage ratios, practice/matter margins, client concentration risk, aged AR/DSO

Technology integration

  • Connect practice management (Clio, MyCase) + time/billing + accounting (QuickBooks, Tabs3, CosmoLex, etc.) for one source of truth

How Law-Firm CFOs Differ from Corporate CFOs

  • Regulatory depth: IOLTA, state bar rules, malpractice implications
  • Matter economics: Time applied to unique matters—not products/subscriptions
  • Realization expertise: Law-specific leakage between hours worked, billed, and collected
  • Partnership dynamics: Draws, distributions, capital, and governance
  • Contingency portfolios: Lumpy receipts, case-cost financing, portfolio modelingTrust Accounting & IOLTA: Non-Negotiables

Common failures (and bar triggers):

  • Commingling client/firm funds—even “just to smooth cash flow”
  • Insufficient balances vs. client ledgers
  • Disbursements before funds clear or without authorization
  • Missing records (many jurisdictions require 5–7 years)

Three-way reconciliation proves:

  1. Bank balance, 2) Sum of client trust ledgers, 3) GL trust balance — all match exactly.
    Most firms do 2-way only and miss the client-ledger check—where errors hide.


Matter-Level Profitability: From Intuition to Data

Track, compare, and act on:

  • Direct attorney cost rates vs. realized billing
  • Staff/paralegal time and recoveries
  • Pass-through expenses vs. absorbed costs
  • Overhead allocation by effort or revenue

Example: An insurance-defense book (25% of revenue) returned only 8% of profit due to low panel rates and write-offs. Shifting focus to higher-margin commercial litigation raised firm margins materially.

Partner Compensation: Align Pay with Strategy

  • Balance objective metrics (originations, hours, realization) with discretionary firm-building factors
  • Separate steady draws from performance-based distributions
  • Account for capital contributions in returns/interest
  • Make criteria transparent to reduce disputes and preserve culture

Key Services You Can Expect

Trust Accounting Management & Compliance

  • System design, approvals, segregation of duties
  • Monthly three-way reconciliations with documented variance resolution
  • Bar-audit readiness (reports, trails, SOPs) + staff training

Realization Optimization

  • Rate/discount diagnostics by attorney, client, and matter
  • Better billing narratives and invoicing cadence
  • Collections workflow (reminders at 30/45/60, call ownership, escalation)
  • Pricing strategy (AFAs/flat/contingency/value-based) and targeted rate moves

Partner Compensation Modeling

  • Formula design and sensitivity testing
  • Draw/distribution cash-flow forecasting
  • Tax distribution planning (K-1 projections)
  • New-partner buy-ins and economic impact analysis

Practice/Matter Analytics

  • Practice-area P&Ls (revenue, margin, realization, utilization)
  • Client-level profitability across portfolios
  • Attorney productivity insights to inform hiring and coaching

Strategic Planning & Cash Flow

  • Budgets, rolling forecasts, and working-capital planning
  • Growth financing (LOCs, term loans, capital calls)
  • M&A diligence, valuation, and deal structuring

Metrics Every Managing Partner Should Track

Realization & collection

  • Realization: Billed / Standard billable value (target 90%+)
  • Collection: Collected / Billed (watch trends)
  • Overall realization: Collected / Standard value (combined signal)

Revenue per lawyer & leverage

  • RPL benchmarks vary by practice; many solid firms land $400k–$600k per attorney
  • Staff leverage: typically 0.75:1 to 1.5:1 (practice dependent)

Working capital & DSO

  • DSO = (AR / Revenue) × 365 — keep <60 days; >90 signals trouble
  • Aged AR % >90 days is a red flag

Fractional vs. Full-Time CFO

Fractional (great fit for):

  • 5–50 attorneys; 15–20 hrs/week need
  • Straightforward economics; budget of $60k–$150k/year

Full-Time (when to graduate):

  • 50+ attorneys, multi-office complexity
  • Daily executive involvement; manages controllers, billing, AR teams
  • Complex contingency portfolios or sophisticated corporate practices

Common path: fractional at 10–40 attorneys → full-time at ~40–50+ as complexity scales.


How CFOs Move the Needle (Real Outcomes)

Identify unprofitable work

  • Exit low-margin panels; invest in higher-margin practices
  • Result in one firm: margin ↑ from 24% → 37% with revenue growth

Fix billing & collections

  • Biweekly billing, better narratives, owned follow-ups
  • Result: DSO 89 → 54 days, +$240k working-capital unlock, $43k fewer bad-debt write-offs

Invest where profits really are

  • Reweight budget, hires, and tooling toward high-realization practices
  • Multi-year lift in profit share and retention

Connect Your Systems (So Data Actually Flows)

  • Practice management (Clio, MyCase, PracticePanther): time, matters, docs
  • Billing & accounting (QuickBooks, Tabs3, CosmoLex, PCLaw): AR/AP, trust
  • Ideal flow: time → billing → invoices → GL; payments update both operating and trust correctly; matter and client data stay consistent

Choosing the Right Law-Firm CFO

Must-haves

  • References from firms like yours
  • Hands-on trust accounting/IOLTA expertise (your jurisdiction)
  • Matter-level profitability and realization chops
  • Clio/MyCase + legal accounting experience
  • A track record of margin and cash-flow improvement

Red flags

  • “We’ll figure out trust accounting later”
  • No law-firm references
  • Generic dashboards that ignore realization/collection dynamics

Good questions to ask

  • How do you run three-way reconciliations and prove compliance?
  • Show an example of matter-level profitability analysis you’ve implemented.
  • Which AFAs improved realization in firms like ours—and when do they fail?

Getting Started

CFO services built for law firms deliver what generic finance can’t: audit-proof trust accounting, higher realization, aligned partner compensation, and matter-level insight that drives profitable growth.

Exact Partners supports boutiques to multi-office firms and works seamlessly with Clio, MyCase, QuickBooks, and more.

Schedule a consultation: getexact.com • (716) 249-6434